Employment discrimination law in the United States originates from the common law, and is codified in many state, federal, and regional laws. These laws forbid discrimination based upon particular characteristics or "safeguarded categories". The United States Constitution also forbids discrimination by federal and state governments against their public staff members. Discrimination in the economic sector is not directly constrained by the Constitution, however has actually become based on a growing body of federal and state law, including the Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964. Federal law forbids discrimination in a number of locations, consisting of recruiting, employing, task evaluations, promo policies, training, payment and disciplinary action. State laws frequently extend security to extra classifications or companies.

Under federal employment discrimination law, companies normally can not victimize staff members on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (including sexual orientation and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religion, [1] nationwide origin, [1] special needs (physical or psychological, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for workers over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] insolvency or uncollectable bills, [9] genetic details, [10] and citizenship status (for people, irreversible residents, momentary residents, refugees, and asylees). [11]

List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963
Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964


Title IX

Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not directly deal with work discrimination, however its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have actually been held to safeguard federal government workers.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deprive people of "life, liberty, or property", without due process of the law. It likewise includes an implicit warranty that the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly prohibits states from violating a person's rights of due process and equivalent defense. In the employment context, these Constitutional arrangements would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their work practices by dealing with workers, previous employees, or task candidates unequally since of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due process protection needs that federal government employees have a fair procedural procedure before they are terminated if the termination is connected to a "liberty" (such as the right to totally free speech) or property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the stipulation that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination bills (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the private sector is not unconstitutional due to the fact that Federal and most State Constitutions do not specifically give their particular government the power to enact civil rights laws that apply to the economic sector. The Federal federal government's authority to regulate a personal service, consisting of civil rights laws, comes from their power to manage all commerce in between the States. Some State Constitutions do specifically pay for some protection from public and private employment discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions only address inequitable treatment by the federal government, including a public employer.

Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil rights laws that manage the economic sector are normally Constitutional under the "cops powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws designed to safeguard public health, security and morals. All States need to stick to the Federal Civil Rights laws, however States may enact civil rights laws that use extra employment security.

For example, some State civil liberties laws use defense from work discrimination on the basis of political association, despite the fact that such types of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil rights laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing employment discrimination has established over time.

The Equal Pay Act modified the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is imposed by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act forbids employers and unions from paying various wages based upon sex. It does not prohibit other discriminatory practices in working with. It supplies that where employees perform equal work in the corner needing "equal skill, effort, and duty and carried out under similar working conditions," they must be provided equivalent pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act uses to companies engaged in some element of interstate commerce, or all of an employer's workers if the business is engaged as a whole in a substantial amount of interstate commerce. [citation needed]

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in a lot more elements of the work relationship. "Title VII produced the Equal Job opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It applies to a lot of companies participated in interstate commerce with more than 15 workers, labor companies, and employment service. Title VII forbids discrimination based on race, color, faith, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it unlawful for companies to discriminate based upon secured characteristics concerning terms, conditions, and privileges of employment. Employment agencies might not discriminate when working with or referring applicants, and labor companies are likewise prohibited from basing membership or union classifications on race, color, religion, sex, or nationwide origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act changed Title VII in 1978, specifying that unlawful sex discrimination consists of discrimination based upon pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. [4] An associated statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]

Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "forbids discrimination by federal contractors and subcontractors on account of race, color, faith, sex, or national origin [and] requires affirmative action by federal professionals". [14]

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and changed in 1978 and 1986, restricts companies from discriminating on the basis of age. The restricted practices are almost identical to those outlined in Title VII, other than that the ADEA secures workers in firms with 20 or more employees instead of 15 or more. A worker is protected from discrimination based upon age if she or he is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has actually phased out and forbade necessary retirement, except for high-powered decision-making positions (that likewise supply large pensions). The ADEA includes specific guidelines for advantage, pension and retirement strategies. [7] Though ADEA is the center of many conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history starting with the abolishment of "maximum ages of entry into work in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "developed a policy versus age discrimination among federal specialists". [15]

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 forbids employment discrimination on the basis of disability by the federal government, federal contractors with contracts of more than $10,000, and programs receiving federal monetary assistance. [16] It needs affirmative action in addition to non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs affordable lodging, and Section 508 requires that electronic and information innovation be accessible to disabled staff members. [16]

The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 forbids discrimination by mine operators against miners who suffer from "black lung disease" (pneumoconiosis). [17]

The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "needs affirmative action for handicapped and Vietnam period veterans by federal contractors". [14]

The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 prohibits work discrimination on the basis of bankruptcy or uncollectable bills. [9]

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 restricts employers with more than three employees from victimizing anybody (except an unauthorized immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to remove discriminatory barriers versus qualified people with specials needs, individuals with a record of an impairment, or people who are considered having a special needs. It restricts discrimination based upon genuine or perceived physical or psychological specials needs. It likewise needs companies to supply reasonable accommodations to employees who need them since of a disability to get a job, carry out the important functions of a job, or enjoy the benefits and benefits of employment, unless the company can reveal that unnecessary challenge will result. There are rigorous limitations on when an employer can ask disability-related questions or need medical checkups, and all medical info needs to be treated as personal. A disability is defined under the ADA as a mental or physical health condition that "considerably restricts one or more major life activities. " [5]

The Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Acts, modified in 1993, ensure all persons equivalent rights under the law and detail the damages available to plaintiffs in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars employers from utilizing people' genetic information when making hiring, firing, job placement, or promo choices. [10]

The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [21] As of June 2018 [update], 28 US states do not clearly include sexual preference and 29 US states do not explicitly consist of gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT work discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts employment discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is encompassed by the law's prohibition of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and disgaeawiki.info R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), work protections for LGBT individuals were patchwork; numerous states and localities explicitly prohibit harassment and predisposition in work decisions on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. [22] Prior to the Bostock choice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzed Title VII to cover LGBT employees; the EEOC's figured out that transgender workers were safeguarded under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the defense to incorporate sexual preference in 2015. [24] [25]

According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies show that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have experienced some form of discrimination and harassment at the work environment. Moreover, a staggering 90 percent of transgender employees report some kind of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Many individuals in the LGBT neighborhood have lost their task, consisting of Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender lady who claims that her manager informed her that her existence may make other individuals feel unpleasant. [26]

Almost half of the United States likewise have state-level or municipal-level laws banning the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender individuals in both public and private workplaces. A few more states ban LGBT discrimination in only public work environments. [27] Some challengers of these laws think that it would invade religious liberty, although these laws are focused more on discriminatory actions, not beliefs. Courts have also identified that these laws do not infringe totally free speech or spiritual liberty. [28]

State law

State statutes likewise supply extensive protection from work discrimination. Some laws extend similar security as offered by the federal acts to companies who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes offer defense to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws provide higher protection to workers of the state or of state professionals.

The following table lists classifications not secured by federal law. Age is included as well, given that federal law only covers employees over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - enlisting, personal look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]

Government employees

Title VII also applies to state, federal, regional and other public employees. Employees of federal and state federal governments have additional securities versus employment discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 prohibits discrimination in federal work on the basis of conduct that does not affect job performance. The Office of Personnel Management has translated this as forbiding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [91] In June 2009, it was revealed that the analysis would be expanded to include gender identity. [92]

Additionally, public staff members retain their First Amendment rights, whereas personal companies deserve to limitations workers' speech in specific ways. [93] Public employees maintain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public concern, and their speech is not interfering with their task. [93]

Federal employees who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal employees of the United States Postal Service (USPS) should take legal action against in the proper federal jurisdiction, which postures a different set of problems for complainants.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational credentials

Employers are typically permitted to consider characteristics that would otherwise be prejudiced if they are authentic occupational qualifications (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the 2nd most typical BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be used for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this rule is demonstrated in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court rules that law enforcement monitoring can match races when necessary. For example, if authorities are running operations that include personal informants, or undercover agents, sending an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, authorities departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can consider race-based policing and hire officers that are in proportion to the neighborhood's racial makeup. [94]

BFOQs do not use in the show business, such as casting for films and television. [95] Directors, manufacturers and casting personnel are permitted to cast characters based upon physical attributes, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination declares for Disparate Treatment are uncommon in the show business, specifically in entertainers. [95] This reason is special to the show business, and does not move to other markets, such as retail or food. [95]

Often, companies will use BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be a cost validation in wage gaps in between various groups of employees. [96] Cost can be considered when an employer needs to stabilize privacy and security worry about the number of positions that an employer are attempting to fill. [96]

Additionally, client preference alone can not be a validation unless there is a personal privacy or security defense. [96] For circumstances, retail facilities in rural locations can not prohibit African American clerks based upon the racial ideologies of the customer base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that handle kids survivors of sexual assault is permitted.

If an employer were trying to show that work discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there need to be an accurate basis for believing that all or substantially all members of a class would be not able to perform the task securely and effectively or that it is not practical to figure out credentials on a customized basis. [97] Additionally, absence of a malevolent motive does not transform a facially prejudiced policy into a neutral policy with a discriminatory impact. [97] Employers also carry the burden to reveal that a BFOQ is reasonably needed, and a lower inequitable option method does not exist. [98]

Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is treating people in a different way in their work because of their religious beliefs, their religions and practices, and/or their demand for accommodation (a modification in a workplace rule or policy) of their spiritual beliefs and practices. It likewise consists of treating individuals differently in their employment since of their absence of religious belief or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission, companies are prohibited from refusing to employ a specific based on their religion- alike race, sex, age, and special needs. If a worker believes that they have actually experienced religious discrimination, they should resolve this to the supposed transgressor. On the other hand, staff members are secured by the law for reporting job discrimination and are able to file charges with the EEOC. [100] Some places in the U.S. now have stipulations that prohibit discrimination versus atheists. The courts and laws of the United States provide certain exemptions in these laws to businesses or organizations that are religious or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to differing degrees in different areas, depending on the setting and the context; some of these have been supported and others reversed with time.

The most recent and prevalent example of Religious Discrimination is the prevalent rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many workers are utilizing religious beliefs versus modifying the body and preventative medication as a justification to not get the vaccination. Companies that do not enable staff members to make an application for religious exemptions, or decline their application might be charged by the employee with work discrimination on the basis of religions. However, there are particular requirements for employees to present evidence that it is a genuinely held belief. [101]

Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 explicitly allows discrimination against members of the Communist Party.

Military

The armed force has faced criticism for restricting women from serving in battle roles. In 2016, however, the law was changed to allow them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the short article published on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. composes about the way in which black guys were dealt with in the military during the 1940s. According to Gates, throughout that time the whites offered the African Americans a possibility to prove themselves as Americans by having them get involved in the war. The National Geographic website states, nevertheless, that when black soldiers joined the Navy, they were only enabled to work as servants; their involvement was limited to the functions of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans desired to defend the country they lived in, they were denied the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) safeguards the task rights of individuals who voluntarily or involuntarily leave work positions to undertake military service or certain kinds of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise restricts companies from victimizing staff members for previous or present involvement or membership in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that offer choice to veterans versus non-veterans has been declared to impose systemic disparate treatment of women due to the fact that there is a vast underrepresentation of women in the uniformed services. [106] The court has declined this claim due to the fact that there was no discriminatory intent towards ladies in this veteran friendly policy. [106]

Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not directly discriminate against a safeguarded category may still be unlawful if they produce a disparate influence on members of a protected group. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts employment practices that have an inequitable effect, unless they relate to job performance.

The Act needs the removal of synthetic, arbitrary, and unnecessary barriers to employment that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, an employment practice that operates to omit Negroes can not be shown to be related to task performance, it is restricted, notwithstanding the employer's lack of prejudiced intent. [107]

Height and weight requirements have been determined by the EEOC as having a diverse impact on nationwide origin minorities. [108]

When resisting a disparate effect claim that declares age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not require to show need; rather, it needs to simply reveal that its practice is affordable. [citation required]

Enforcing entities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translates and implements the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was established by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are included in area 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its policies and standards are included in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wanting to submit fit under Title VII and/or the ADA need to tire their administrative solutions by submitting an administrative complaint with the EEOC prior to submitting their claim in court. [113]

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs implements Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which forbids discrimination versus certified individuals with specials needs by federal specialists and subcontractors. [114]

Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each company has and enforces its own regulations that apply to its own programs and to any entities that get financial support. [16]

The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) enforces the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which restricts discrimination based upon citizenship status or nationwide origin. [115]

State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces play the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]

Employment Non-Discrimination Act
LGBT work discrimination in the United States
Employment discrimination versus persons with criminal records in the United States
Racial wage space in the United States
Gender pay gap in the United States
Criticism of credit rating systems in the United States


References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ).
^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the original on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the initial on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the original on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525
^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the initial on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b
^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260.
^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the original on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the Family Doctor. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330.
^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the initial on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the initial on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, states the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law bans office bias versus gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the original on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016.
^ a b "Colorado Civil liberty Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the initial on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the original on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on October 8, 2009.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the initial on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the initial on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the initial on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil liberty Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, area 363A.08". Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the original on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the original on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)".
^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful inequitable practice". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "New York State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the original on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "New York Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination versus the engagement in certain activities. - New York City Attorney Resources - New York City Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Rights Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Oklahoma Attorney General Of The United States|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the initial on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [long-term dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the initial on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or viewed HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in work because of age of worker or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [long-term dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the original on January 14, 2007.
^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023.
^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "When is it legal for a company to discriminate in their employing practices based upon a Bona Fide Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare yourself for forum.batman.gainedge.org more US females in combat". CNN. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally posted on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Armed Forces During The Second World War|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions". Findlaw. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Pre 1965: Events Resulting In the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the initial on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement arrangements". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the original on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the initial on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
^ "An Introduction of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009.
External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor
Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission
Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).
- Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, an attorney and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 stops working to safeguard older workers. Weak to start with, she specifies that the ADEA has actually been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.