Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can forecast the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to give it its best shot. With as much as date news and a little but feisty 14 Billion parameter design, our AI is boldly predicting the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to answer mankind's most difficult questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as 2 years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain many pushing questions that are less simple to determine. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has actually been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be better at forecasting the future (and have seen some appealing enhancements - term paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion parameter design which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from lots of months earlier so we have constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified area to make its best prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We posed the following concerns to our AI and gauged its response. While we have actually seen forecast improvements from our training, utilize these price quotes for prop betting at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% chance

Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta element in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposal ...

First, I'll look at the crucial points from the short articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been helpful of his career, attending his video games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.

Some fans are excited, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, specifically provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for forum.batman.gainedge.org Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not resolving the speculation straight.

I believe the essential points are the speculation and his evasive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential occasion, the odds and his responses suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd approximate a low probability, possibly around 5%, considering all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a various front-tush being pushed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable efforts? Looks like our AI believes they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm attempting to determine the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to understand exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it appears like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to execute the move. The post discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I also need to think of the defensive strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they might adjust their defense accordingly, which might either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than 5 appears like a substantial number however possible offered their confidence, I would estimate a likelihood around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the method, and the probability that they'll use it a number of times, especially if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI might not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling back and forth, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That seems substantial since it reveals he's done it previously, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent articles, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could suggest he's less likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he's likewise associated with a fight with Drake, which might provide him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement suit from Drake, so maybe he's careful about consisting of any questionable songs in the efficiency. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he might still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, users.atw.hu which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar might feel obliged to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements throughout the halftime show, so there's a risk that such content might be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making vibrant proceed huge stages. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime program, which may give him more creative flexibility. Plus, his previous habits recommends he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar expressed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might suggest he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, existing shifts in focus, legal issues, and the event's context-the probability seems to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be honest, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the truth that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its forecast? Looks like theres somewhat of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, chessdatabase.science saying he didn't imply to trigger offense which he actually found it amusing himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might indicate he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Looking at the articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food lover and likes cheeseburgers. There's a post specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's an individual who takes pleasure in consuming, particularly with his team. So, if there were plans to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, particularly if the circumstance is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: bytes-the-dust.com 50% chance

"Tails never fails?" You can't deceive the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been predicting the coin toss and 53% are anticipating heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and believes anything can occur when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to determine the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historic data that may influence this prediction.

First, I check out the short articles offered. They all point out the historic data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has actually turned up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a slight edge, however it's not a substantial distinction.

However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The small historic edge for tails might be due to opportunity. But when making forecasts, sometimes individuals weigh historic data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I should consider whether this historical bias needs to affect the probability.

After thinking of it, I decide that while the historic data reveals a small choice for tails, it's not statistically significant sufficient to move the likelihood away from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the slight historical edge exists however does not bypass the truth that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and surgiteams.com are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably think the very same. BUT, its official now because our AI states the chances are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite severe accusation. Let me break this down. First, canadasimple.com I'm seeing a lot of short articles that discuss conspiracy theories suggesting referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful employ recent games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does seem to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get annoyed when their group loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "ludicrous." They state there's no evidence of methodical predisposition. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it may indicate there's no real basis or they would have addressed it in a different way if there was some fact to it.

Looking at the posts, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise pointed out that analytical analysis doesn't show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have been punished more since 2022. That's fascinating since if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate fewer charges, right?

...

So, putting all of it together, the probability that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably extremely low. Maybe not zero since you can't rule out every possibility, however exceptionally unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth viewing the video game still? I think I'll need to wait and see how the video game turns out before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a good video game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was incorrect about whatever, at least it can gain from this.