For Christmas I received an interesting present from a friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.
Yet it was entirely written by AI, kenpoguy.com with a couple of easy prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.
It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.
Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.
There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no animals). And experienciacortazar.com.ar there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.
There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, given that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language design.
I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can purchase any more copies.
There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and joy".
Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.
He wants to broaden his range, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.
It's also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.
Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.
"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.
"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."
In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.
"I do not believe using generative AI for creative functions need to be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective but let's develop it morally and relatively."
OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.
The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.
Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".
He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.
"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of delight," states the Baroness, utahsyardsale.com who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The government is weakening one of its finest performing industries on the unclear guarantee of growth."
A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."
Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library including public data from a large range of sources will also be made readily available to AI scientists.
In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.
But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.
This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.
They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it must be paying for it.
If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for wiki.monnaie-libre.fr a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.
When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts since it's so verbose.
But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain for how long I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global technology, yewiki.org with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.
Outside the UK? Register here.
