U.S. Foreign Policy


Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading online forum for serious conversation of American foreign policy and international affairs. The publication has featured contributions from many leading worldwide affairs specialists.

More Resources

- Feedback

- Institutional Subscriptions

- Gift a Membership

- About Us

- Events

- Issue Archive

- Advertise

- Audio Content

- Account Management

- FAQs


Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger


Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.

Copy Link Copied.
Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai.
Copy

Gift Link Copied.
This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.

Create Citation Copied.
Chicago MLA APSA APA.
Chicago Cite not available at the minute.
MLA Cite not available at the minute.
APSA Cite not available at the moment.
APA Cite not available at the moment

Download PDF.
This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.

Request Reprint.
Request reprint authorizations here.

In the early 1950s, the United States faced a critical intelligence difficulty in its burgeoning competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance images from World War II might no longer supply sufficient intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. security abilities were no longer able to permeate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This shortage spurred an audacious moonshot effort: the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a few years, U-2 objectives were delivering essential intelligence, capturing pictures of Soviet missile setups in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a similar juncture. Competition between Washington and its rivals over the future of the worldwide order is heightening, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States must take benefit of its world-class economic sector and sufficient capability for innovation to outcompete its adversaries. The U.S. intelligence neighborhood need to harness the country's sources of strength to provide insights to policymakers at the speed these days's world. The combination of expert system, especially through big language models, provides groundbreaking chances to improve intelligence operations and analysis, making it possible for the shipment of faster and more appropriate assistance to decisionmakers. This technological revolution includes substantial disadvantages, nevertheless, particularly as enemies make use of comparable advancements to discover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States should challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to secure itself from enemies who might utilize the innovation for ill, and initially to use AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. national security neighborhood, fulfilling the guarantee and handling the hazard of AI will need deep technological and cultural modifications and a desire to change the way firms work. The U.S. intelligence and military neighborhoods can harness the potential of AI while alleviating its fundamental risks, making sure that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a rapidly developing international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States must transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the country means to fairly and safely utilize AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's capacity to transform the intelligence community lies in its ability to process and examine vast quantities of information at extraordinary speeds. It can be challenging to analyze large quantities of collected information to produce time-sensitive cautions. U.S. intelligence services could leverage AI systems' pattern acknowledgment capabilities to identify and alert human experts to prospective hazards, such as missile launches or military motions, or essential global advancements that experts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers have an interest in. This ability would ensure that vital cautions are timely, actionable, and pertinent, enabling more effective actions to both quickly emerging hazards and emerging policy chances. Multimodal models, which integrate text, images, and audio, boost this analysis. For example, using AI to cross-reference satellite imagery with signals intelligence could provide a detailed view of military movements, enabling much faster and more precise risk assessments and possibly brand-new means of delivering details to policymakers.

Intelligence experts can also unload repeated and time-consuming jobs to devices to focus on the most satisfying work: generating original and deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood's general insights and efficiency. A great example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence agencies invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has paid off. The capabilities of language designs have actually grown significantly advanced and accurate-OpenAI's recently launched o1 and o3 models showed significant development in accuracy and reasoning ability-and can be used to a lot more rapidly translate and sum up text, audio, and video files.

Although obstacles remain, future systems trained on higher amounts of non-English data might be efficient in discerning subtle distinctions in between dialects and comprehending the meaning and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By relying on these tools, the intelligence neighborhood might concentrate on training a cadre of highly specialized linguists, who can be hard to find, often battle to make it through the clearance procedure, and take a long time to train. And of course, by making more foreign language materials available throughout the best firms, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to more rapidly triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to choose the needles in the haystack that really matter.

The value of such speed to policymakers can not be ignored. Models can promptly sift through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and conventional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that analysts can then validate and improve, making sure the end products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts might partner with an advanced AI assistant to work through analytical issues, test ideas, and brainstorm in a collective fashion, improving each model of their analyses and delivering finished intelligence more rapidly.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly got into a secret Iranian facility and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of files and an additional 55,000 files kept on CDs, including pictures and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior officials positioned tremendous pressure on intelligence experts to produce detailed evaluations of its material and whether it indicated an ongoing effort to develop an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts numerous months-and hundreds of hours of labor-to translate each page, review it by hand for appropriate material, and integrate that details into evaluations. With today's AI capabilities, the very first two steps in that procedure could have been accomplished within days, perhaps even hours, enabling experts to understand and contextualize the intelligence quickly.

Among the most fascinating applications is the way AI might transform how intelligence is taken in by policymakers, allowing them to connect straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such abilities would permit users to ask particular questions and receive summed up, relevant details from countless reports with source citations, helping them make notified decisions quickly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI uses various benefits, it also positions substantial brand-new risks, particularly as foes develop similar innovations. China's improvements in AI, particularly in computer system vision and surveillance, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the country is ruled by an authoritarian regime, it does not have personal privacy constraints and civil liberty securities. That deficit allows massive data collection practices that have actually yielded information sets of enormous size. Government-sanctioned AI models are trained on huge amounts of personal and behavioral data that can then be used for different purposes, such as surveillance and social control. The existence of Chinese companies, such as Huawei, in telecommunications systems and software application all over the world could supply China with ready access to bulk information, especially bulk images that can be utilized to train facial recognition models, a specific issue in nations with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. national security neighborhood need to consider how Chinese designs constructed on such comprehensive information sets can offer China a tactical benefit.

And it is not just China. The expansion of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those developed by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese company DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI abilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly budget-friendly expenses. Much of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian regimes, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are using big language designs to quickly create and spread out incorrect and harmful material or to conduct cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals intercept abilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every incentive to share some of their AI developments with customer states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, therefore increasing the hazard to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence neighborhood's AI designs will end up being attractive targets for foes. As they grow more powerful and main to U.S. national security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being important national possessions that need to be defended against foes seeking to compromise or manipulate them. The intelligence community need to buy developing safe and secure AI models and in developing requirements for "red teaming" and continuous assessment to secure against potential hazards. These groups can utilize AI to mimic attacks, revealing possible weak points and developing strategies to alleviate them. Proactive procedures, consisting of partnership with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI technologies, will be necessary.

THE NEW NORMAL

These obstacles can not be wished away. Waiting too wish for AI innovations to completely mature carries its own risks; U.S. intelligence capacities will fall behind those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going full steam ahead in developing AI. To guarantee that intelligence-whether time-sensitive warnings or longer-term strategic insight-continues to be a benefit for the United States and its allies, the country's intelligence community needs to adjust and innovate. The intelligence services must rapidly master using AI innovations and make AI a fundamental aspect in their work. This is the only sure way to guarantee that future U.S. presidents get the very best possible intelligence assistance, remain ahead of their enemies, bio.rogstecnologia.com.br and secure the United States' delicate capabilities and operations. Implementing these modifications will need a cultural shift within the intelligence neighborhood. Today, intelligence analysts mainly construct products from raw intelligence and information, with some support from existing AI designs for voice and images analysis. Progressing, intelligence authorities ought to explore including a hybrid approach, in line with existing laws, using AI models trained on unclassified commercially available information and improved with classified details. This amalgam of technology and conventional intelligence event might result in an AI entity supplying direction to images, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an integrated view of typical and anomalous activity, automated images analysis, and automatic voice translation.

To speed up the transition, intelligence leaders must promote the benefits of AI combination, emphasizing the enhanced capabilities and efficiency it uses. The cadre of recently appointed chief AI officers has been developed in U.S. intelligence and defense to function as leads within their firms for promoting AI innovation and eliminating barriers to the technology's implementation. Pilot tasks and early wins can construct momentum and confidence in AI's abilities, motivating broader adoption. These officers can utilize the know-how of nationwide labs and other partners to check and refine AI designs, guaranteeing their efficiency and security. To institutionalize change, leaders ought to create other organizational incentives, consisting of promos and training opportunities, to reward inventive methods and those staff members and systems that show reliable usage of AI.

The White House has actually created the policy required for using AI in nationwide security agencies. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order relating to safe, safe and secure, higgledy-piggledy.xyz and credible AI detailed the assistance required to fairly and securely utilize the innovation, and National Security Memorandum 25, issued in October 2024, is the nation's fundamental technique for harnessing the power and managing the threats of AI to advance nationwide security. Now, Congress will need to do its part. Appropriations are required for departments and companies to produce the facilities required for innovation and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and evaluations, and continue to invest in examination capabilities to ensure that the United States is building dependable and high-performing AI technologies.

Intelligence and military neighborhoods are dedicated to keeping people at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have actually produced the frameworks and tools to do so. Agencies will require standards for how their analysts should use AI designs to make certain that intelligence products fulfill the intelligence community's requirements for reliability. The federal government will likewise need to maintain clear assistance for dealing with the information of U.S. citizens when it pertains to the training and use of big language designs. It will be very important to balance the usage of emerging technologies with securing the personal privacy and civil liberties of citizens. This means enhancing oversight systems, updating appropriate frameworks to reflect the abilities and dangers of AI, and fostering a culture of AI advancement within the national security apparatus that harnesses the potential of the innovation while protecting the rights and liberties that are foundational to American society.

Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the leading edge of overhead and satellite imagery by establishing many of the crucial technologies itself, winning the AI race will require that community to reimagine how it partners with private industry. The economic sector, which is the main means through which the government can recognize AI development at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research, information centers, and calculating power. Given those companies' developments, intelligence firms ought to prioritize leveraging commercially available AI models and fine-tuning them with classified data. This approach makes it possible for the intelligence community to quickly expand its abilities without needing to begin from scratch, allowing it to remain competitive with foes. A recent cooperation in between NASA and IBM to create the world's biggest geospatial structure model-and the subsequent release of the design to the AI community as an open-source project-is an excellent presentation of how this type of public-private collaboration can work in practice.

As the nationwide security community integrates AI into its work, it must ensure the security and resilience of its models. Establishing standards to deploy generative AI safely is crucial for maintaining the integrity of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's new AI Security Center and its cooperation with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.

As the United States deals with growing rivalry to form the future of the global order, it is immediate that its intelligence firms and military profit from the nation's innovation and management in AI, focusing particularly on big language designs, to provide faster and more relevant details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight needed to navigate a more complicated, competitive, and content-rich world.